
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
22340 cc w33 skfTechnische Basisdaten Axiallastfaktor: Y0: 2 Axiallastfaktor: Y1: 2 Axiallastfaktor: Y2: 3 Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 224 kN Gewicht: 91100 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 1 500 r min Grenzwert: e: 0. 33 Hersteller: SKF Innendurchmesser: 200 mm Kantenabstand: r12: min. 5 mm Referenzdrehzahl: 1 200 r min Erweiterte technische Daten 22. 3 mm ueres Breitenma der Umfangsnut Anzahl der Reihen 2 ueres Breitenma der Umfangsnut: b: 22. 3 mm Candidate for remanufacturing Ja
Technische Basisdaten
| Axiallastfaktor: Y0: 2 |
| Axiallastfaktor: Y1: 2 |
| Axiallastfaktor: Y2: 3 |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 224 kN |
| Gewicht: 91100 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 1 500 r/min |
| Grenzwert: e: 0.33 |
| Hersteller: SKF |
| Innendurchmesser: 200 mm |
| Kantenabstand: r12: min.5 mm |
| Referenzdrehzahl: 1 200 r/min |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 22.3 mm Äußeres Breitenmaß der Umfangsnut |
| Anzahl der Reihen 2 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß der Umfangsnut: b: 22.3 mm |
| Candidate for remanufacturing Ja |
| Dynamische Tragzahl 2 439 kN |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 2 439 kN |
| Einzelgewicht 90.5 kg |
| Grenzdrehzahl 1 500 r/min |
| Nachschmierfunktion Für |
| Referenzdrehzahl 1 200 r/min |
| Statische Tragzahl 2 900 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 2 900 kN |
| Tolerance class for dimensions Normal |
| Tolerance class for run-out P5 |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171510 |
| eClass-Code 23-05-09-11 |
| max.4 mm Radius der Rundung |
| min.5 mm Kantenabstand |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 438 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great shoes
Size: 6 Toddler, Color: Brown
Perfect for little ones
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great kids sandals
Size: 9 Toddler, Color: Taupe
These are cute and my kids say they’re comfortable! We got a few colors. Definitely would purchase again. They’ve got good quality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Super wide
Size: 13 Little Kid, Color: Taupe
They are oddly very wide. Great for kids with wide chunky feet but for us it was not cute
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Nice but runs small
Size: 7 Big Kid, Color: Navy
The sandals are nice and not to hard or flimsy but they are cut very small.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Solid Kids Sandals, Overpriced Like Most Kids Shoes 🌞
Size: 11 Little Kid, Color: Brown, Size: 11 Little Kid, Color: Brown
My son hasn’t worn these yet since it’s December in Indiana and sandals + snow obviously don’t mix. 😂 So this review is based on first impressions rather than long term wear.
That said, these seem wider than a lot of typical kids’ sandals, which I REALLY appreciate since we tend to have wider feet in our family. #hobbitfeet
The quality feels pretty decent overall. They’re described as lightweight, and while they’re not insanely lightweight, they do have enough weight to feel semi-sturdy and not flimsy or cheap. I like the style and color, and I think they’ll work well for my son once warmer weather hits.
My main complaint is the price. At just under $24 at the time of this review, it feels a little high for kids’ sandals and for what these are. I really feel like $20 MAX would make more sense. Kids shoes are almost always priced like adult shoes, even though they clearly use less material, and that’s hard for me to understand and wrap my mind around. Overall, these seem solid for daily wear, I just wish the price was a bit more reasonable and affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 31, 2025