Netline Home Mink Brown Ethnic Classic Machine Washable Chenille Rug Design 347-01
SKU: 39714668822

Netline Home Mink Brown Ethnic Classic Machine Washable Chenille Rug Design 347-01

$63.00 $70.00
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on sylv1net.com >

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Netline Home Mink Brown Ethnic Classic Machine Washable Chenille Rug Design 347-01Netline Home Mink Brown Ethnic Classic Machine Washable Chenille Rug Design 347 01 Netline Home Mink Brown Ethnic Classic Machine Washable Chenille Rug Design 347 01 is a made to order rug listing from Netline Home, created for customers who want a refined machine washable chenille rug with a warm kilim character, practical everyday comfort, and a polished interior design look. This design belongs to the Netline Lacasa collection and is prepared as a

Netline Home Mink Brown Ethnic Classic Machine Washable Chenille Rug Design 347-01

Netline Home Mink Brown Ethnic Classic Machine Washable Chenille Rug Design 347-01 is a made-to-order rug listing from Netline Home, created for customers who want a refined machine washable chenille rug with a warm kilim character, practical everyday comfort, and a polished interior-design look. This design belongs to the Netline Lacasa collection and is prepared as a flexible Shopify product listing with size variants, searchable product data, image-based content, and clear room-use language. The product is named from the organized media folder as a Ethnic Classic style in Mink Brown colors. The product is written for shoppers who compare rugs by texture, room fit, backing, color mood, and pattern detail before they choose the right piece for a living room, bedroom, hallway, kitchen, entryway, or studio.

The visual direction of this rug is led by the product image URLs supplied with the original catalog. The primary image is used as the main design reference, while the gallery images support close review of pattern scale, border rhythm, weave character, and styling potential. Instead of relying on a short generic description, this listing gives shoppers enough context to understand how the rug may work in real homes. It highlights the softness of chenille, machine washable care, the low-profile kilim-inspired structure, and the easy layering effect that makes the piece suitable for modern, transitional, vintage, bohemian, farmhouse, and relaxed contemporary interiors. Customers can use the imported Shopify images to compare color balance, motif spacing, edge detail, and overall mood before selecting a size.

Why customers choose this Netline Home rug

  • Machine washable construction for easier care in active homes.
  • Soft chenille texture with a low-profile kilim look.
  • Curated for the Netline Lacasa collection by Netline Home.
  • Available sizes: 100x200 cm, 120x180 cm, 155x230 cm, 200x300 cm, 60x90 cm, 80x150 cm, 80x300 cm.
  • Design code: 347-01.

Size, packing volume and weight

Size Packing volume Weight
60x90 cm 31x31x4 cm 0.86 kg
80x150 cm 41x41x6 cm 1.86 kg
80x300 cm 41x41x8 cm 3.8 kg
100x200 cm 50x34x7 cm 3 kg
120x180 cm 41x46x6 cm 3.36 kg
155x230 cm 55x52x6 cm 5.6 kg
200x300 cm 53x58x10 cm 9 kg

This made-to-order rug listing is optimized for shoppers searching for a chenille rug, kilim rug, runner rug, machine washable decorative rug, soft textured area rug, non-slip cotton back rug, and custom size home decor rug under the Netline Home brand. The language is intentionally clear and descriptive so the product can be found through collection pages, internal search, Google Shopping data, and long-tail organic searches. The rug is presented as a versatile foundation piece: it can soften a seating area, add visual depth under a coffee table, define a bedside zone, warm up a corridor, or bring pattern to a kitchen without making the room feel heavy. The chenille surface gives the design a comfortable hand-feel, while the kilim-inspired profile keeps the overall look tidy and easy to place with furniture.

For styling, pair Netline Home Mink Brown Ethnic Classic Machine Washable Chenille Rug Design 347-01 with natural wood, matte black metal, cream upholstery, linen textures, stoneware, woven baskets, glass tables, or low-profile sofas. In compact apartments, it can make a small room feel more intentional by anchoring the furniture layout. In larger spaces, the available size options help create a more generous rug footprint that connects chairs, tables, and storage pieces into one calm composition. If the design is used as a hallway runner, the pattern can guide the eye through the space and add interest to otherwise simple flooring. If it is used in a bedroom, the soft texture can create a warmer landing area around the bed. For dining or kitchen-adjacent areas, the low-profile character helps the rug sit neatly without overwhelming cabinetry or chair legs.

Every Netline Home listing is prepared with practical ecommerce details in mind. The product name is written in English, the vendor is set to Netline Home, the product type is assigned as Rugs, the tags are organized around room use and material keywords, and the image gallery is imported from the existing image URLs. The description also includes image references so customers and search engines can connect the written content with the visual product story. Available sizes for this listing are 100x200 cm, 120x180 cm, 155x230 cm, 200x300 cm, 60x90 cm, 80x150 cm, 80x300 cm. The design reference is 347-01, which helps store admins, customers, and support teams identify the correct pattern quickly when discussing made-to-order rug options.

The design metadata for this product is intentionally visible in the content: style is Ethnic Classic, color family is Mink Brown, and the design code is 347-01. This creates a unique product name and a clearer shopping path for customers who browse by color, pattern family, or decor style. Because all products in this made-to-order rug range are machine washable, the listing also supports shoppers looking for easier care rugs for family homes, rentals, pet-friendly rooms, and high-use spaces.

Design reference: The product imagery starts with the primary Netline Home gallery image, with the full gallery imported into Shopify from the image URLs.

Image URLs used for this listing are stored in the Shopify image columns and also referenced in this HTML description for richer product context. Gallery image data:

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 39714668822

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 278 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jay
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
Stylish
Color: 01-silver
Good sturdy stand for paper towels. Has small suction cups on bottom for stability. Good finish and good fit under the counter. Heavy base and not flimsy feeling. Brushed aluminum matched other appliances well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
The product comes in multiple colors, but the function is terrible
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History
Format: Paperback
Recently I wrote a review of Peter Enns' book "The Evolution of Adam" in which I made a brief reference to David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: The 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible." Several friends who read the review emailed me, curious about Rohl's book and encouraging me to follow up on Enns' book with a somewhat detailed review of From Eden to Exile. Hence...this review. From Eden to Exile is Rohl's own "follow-up" to his previous book "Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest." It's important here that I inform the reader of the following: (1) Pharaohs and Kings (in my view) is a far more compelling book than From Eden to Exile; and (2) I would strongly recommend that readers unfamiliar with Rohl read Pharaohs and Kings, prior to reading From Eden to Exile. With these thoughts in mind (and before commenting on Eden to Exile), I believe it will prove worthwhile to focus briefly on Rohl's Pharaohs and Kings prior to moving on to his second book - the two being closely related in terms of subject matter. First, it needs to be stated here at the outset that Rohl (unfortunately) has not received much in the way of either praise and/or encouragment from his fellow Egyptologists, most of whom see him as a sort of "reckless intruder" into the discipline, presenting arguments for a revised chronology (what Rohl refers to as "the New Chronology") that his critics appear to regard as little more than fanciful speculation. This is most unfortunate. Rohl's views are fully deserving of critical assessment; however, the casual (sometimes contemptuous) manner with which his views have been almost entirely dismissed hardly constitutes the "finest hour" in the discipline of ancient Egyptian studies - and this would include the oftentimes quite dismissive attitude of Kenneth A. Kitchen, an Egyptologist and conservative Christian who has written his own book on the subject:"On the Reliability of the Old Testament," Eerdmans, 2003. I clearly am no scholar on the history of ancient Egypt. On the other hand, I have been reading on the subject extensively now for more than 40 years - and this out of sheer love for the subject as opposed to academic profession. And one thing I have learned throughout this reading process is that ancient Egyptian chronology is - for a certainty - in some degree of chaos. (It's not all that difficult to locate comments to this effect from Egyptologists themselves). The standard reference guide for the chronology of ancient Egypt is based foundationally on a chronological history of the ancient pharaohs that dates all the way back to the writings of an Egyptian priest named Manetho, whose written account dates to the third century BC - not exactly what we normally consider "the latest available evidence." Furthermore, Manetho's account itself has not survived; what we do know of it is to be found in the writings of Josephus (first century AD), and the early church fathers Julius Africanus (third century AD) and Eusebius (fourth century AD). Indeed, Egyptian scholar (and conservative Christian) James K. Hoffmeier acknowledges as much in his recent book "Ancient Israel in Sinai" (Oxford, 2005) when he writes regarding Manetho's account: "It is widely acknowledged that names are garbled and that some of the dynasties are not sequential but contemporaneous, and that there are clearly legendary stories preserved... Nevertheless," he continues, "Manetho is taken seriously in historical studies." Indeed he is! Egyptologists have precious little more to go on from the ancient world other than Manetho's account. And yet it is somewhat astonishing to discover the extent to which Manetho's account has been (for the most part) dogmatized into a rigid system that appears to be unyielding. And it is against this rigid wall of Egyptological dogmatism that Rohl must butt his head. (Little wonder that he is not fondly regarded within the discipline). That being said, I would strongly caution all readers (and especially readers of the Old Testament, where a good deal of its chronology is tied directly to Manetho's modernized system) to regard this correlation - between OT chronology and Egyptian chronology - with some degree of appropriate caution. In fact, the very controversy over the date of the Exodus (13th century or 15th century) is related directly to the unbridled confusion surrounding ancient Egyptian chronology. As regards From Eden to Exile I would state the following: (1) Rohl's treatment of early Genesis (Adam to Abraham) is highly speculative and he appears to be connecting dots that were never intended to be contiguous; (2) his book takes on greater promise when he reaches the area of his own particular expertise: Joseph in Egypt. Rohl places Joseph firmly within the 12th dynasty, during the reign of pharaohs Senuseret III and Amenemhat III - and his arguments here (despite the standard protest from his fellow scholars) are highly compelling and fully deserving of something other than "we standard Egyptologists always know best!" (Quite frankly, I've reached the point where I believe a more positive - and more accurate! - understanding of ancient Egyptian chronology will have to await the work of younger scholars (and Rohl has plenty of them!) who are more willing to think outside the box by considering other possibilities. As so often happens, we must simply wait for the 'old guard' to retire so that younger scholars - with fresh ideas and a willingness to engage new evidence - can take their place.) And, finally (3); although much of From Eden to Exile is written in a style reminiscent of historical novels, this should not (in and of itself) cause the reader to think that all we have here is manufactured storyline. On the contrary (certainly beginning with Joseph), Rohl weaves his factual history into the unfolding story in such a way as to make the history not only real but filled with life and event. Furthermore, Rohl fully acknowledges in his Introduction that he will be telling a narrative story as he seeks to "fill in the gaps" where hard evidence from ancient historical sources is plain and simply unavailable. And because Rohl distances himself from any particular religious affiliation it means that both evangelicals and fundamentalists should be able to read his account to great profit, without becoming unduly disturbed by some of his conclusions (e.g., the first five chapters). Indeed, his astonishing defense of the historical integrity of the biblical account displays enormous objectivity, far surpassing (in many ways) various books on the subject that have been produced by Christian publishers throughout the past 25 years. I would like to conclude my comments here by strongly urging all evangelical OT scholars to thoroughly familiarize themselves with Rohl's writings - Pharaohs and Kings in particular. Despite his critics this book is entirely deserving of serious reflection. His defense of a 15th century date for the Exodus is (in my view...and the view of many others) highly compelling and by no means easy to dismiss. (I fully understand that most evangelical scholars opt for the later date of 1250 BC during the reign of Rameses II). One continues to wonder, however, why the reference to Rameses in Genesis 47:11 is so easily regarded as an anachronism while Exodus 1:11 somehow places one firmly within the reign of Rameses II. Or why the clear reference to 480 years in 1 Kings 6:1 is so easily dismissed as most likely merely symbolic as opposed to actual - this despite the additional support for a literal understanding of these years that one gets from Joshua 11:26. But then we already know why: standard Egyptian chronology places Rameses II in the mid-thirteenth century BC, all of which "harmonizes" so well with Exodus 1:11. Thus, ipso facto, the Exodus occurred @ 1250 BC. I find myself far more persuaded by Rohl's account of the Hyksos invasion of Egypt (very likely the Asiatic Amalakites of Exodus 17) following upon the Exodus, when Egypt was almost disemboweled and severely weakened by a God named Yahweh, then any other account of the Hyksos invasion I have ever read from any standard Egyptian historian. (By the way: a quick perusal of ten books in my own library on ancient Egypt displays an enormous amount of diversity and subjective opinion, a rather clear indication that (voices to the contrary) there is precious little overall harmony and understanding amongst the scholars themselves when dealing with numerous aspects of ancient Egypt and its pharaohs.) Perhaps all of Rohl's conclusions are entirely bogus. Nonetheless, the massive amount of information he offers the reader for serious consideration needs to be offset by responsible Egyptian historians who can demonstrate (clearly and persuasively) the error of his ways, and do so with strong and powerful evidence that will illustrate the point. (Ad hominen arguments are worthless as a retort.) I have yet to see such a detailed book (with good, solid evidence as opposed to preferred dogmatism) written in response to the growing body of historical evidence that Rohl and his staff of young investigators are busy compiling. This fact alone only raises more unsettling questions regarding the overall integrity of an Egyptian chronology that rests almost entirely and uncritically on a now lost document that dates back to several centuries before Christ. Rohl, via his own admission, is clearly outside the Christian faith...or any other faith. However, in terms of defending the historical integrity of scripture, he may well be the best friend any believer ever had. All the more, therefore, is the pity that OT scholars either have chosen to ignore him entirely...or (the more likely alternative) have never even heard of him. Hopefully...this will change in the very near future.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2012
M
Verified Purchase
Mark W. Miller
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
the garden was a real place, legends do have seeds of truth
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
very well researched and the use of multiple sources/ events used to lock in events and CHRONOLOGIES is done with a sense of going where the evidence leads, instead of trying to CREATE a narrative. it is amazing how the people and place names shift thru the various empires and then later, the legends. very interesting that the exodus event vanquishes egypt, the the hyksos/ indo europeans take over and loot upper egypt. I totally agree with shishak mistake and new chronology. I find it fascinating king Akhenaten and tut were contemporary with king david and soloman. very interesting read about etruscians/ rome and carthage being remnants of troy. I love history this was a very interesting read. but be prepared for a menagerie of languages and names.....
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2020
P
Verified Purchase
Paco
Houston, US
★★★★★ 4
Time will tell.
Format: Paperback
The New Chronology, the unorthodox historical time frame upon which this book is based, may be regarded by Professor Kitchen and other expert scholars in this field as 'one hundred per cent rubbish' but that does not prevent this book from being a very interesting and enjoyable read. As to the correctness or otherwise of the theory advanced, only time will tell.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2013

recommand products

Solid 14k Rose Gold VS Simulated CZ heart Ring
1134.99
Solid 14k White Gold 5x3mm Oval Simulated Pink Tourmaline Ring
1023.00
Solid 14k White Gold 6x4mm Pear Simulated Amethyst ChecKer AA CZ Ring
321.50
Solid 14k White Gold 6x4mm Pear Simulated Pink Tourmaline AA CZ Ring
362.00
Solid 14k White Gold 6mm Heart Simulated Amethyst VS CZ Ring
323.00