Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 11 - Jul 16
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Strictly Better (Magic Minigame) [Kaldheim Minigame]Set: Kaldheim Minigame Type: Card Magic Minigame Rarity: Common 3 6 players 3 6 packs 15 minutes OBJECTIVE: Some cards are strong in Standard, others shine in Draft, but which card looks the tastiest? Take turns being the Judge and decide which Magic card is the best of the best in each wacky category. GET READY: Randomly determine who will be the first Judge. Each player then opens a pack, removes any cards without Magic backs, and looks at their
| Set: | Kaldheim Minigame |
| Type: | Card — Magic Minigame |
| Rarity: | Common |
3-6 players | 3-6 packs | 15 minutes
OBJECTIVE:
Some cards are strong in Standard, others shine in Draft, but which card looks the tastiest? Take turns being the Judge and decide which Magic card is the best of the best in each wacky category.
GET READY:
Randomly determine who will be the first Judge. Each player then opens a pack, removes any cards without Magic backs, and looks at their cards.
LET’S PLAY:
The Judge chooses a category from the list on the back of this card (either their favorite or at random). The other players each secretly submit a card from their pack that they think fits the category.
When the Judge has collected all the cards, they reveal each card, read it aloud, then choose the winner.
The Judge role then passes to the next player, and they select a different category.
TO WIN:
The first player to win three categories is the winner!
CATEGORIES:
1. Best vacation spot
2. First pick in Draft
3. Grossest
4. Cutest
5. Shiniest
6. Best rock band name
7. Most likely to eat a hedron
8. Best party leader
9. Most inept
10. Coolest treasure
11. Most heroic
12. Most likely to split the party
13. Loudest
14. The next Planeswalker
15. The next fad diet
16. Best mystery novel title
17. Best birthday gift
18. Best win condition
19. Worst weather
20. Worst way to die
21. Best flavor text
22. Best dinner date
23. Most likely to steal your date
24. Best dressed
25. Tastiest
26. Hottest
27. Biggest
28. Smallest
29. Most dangerous job
30. Dream job
31. Most colorful
32. Colossal Dreadmaw’s dinner
33. Last picked in dodgeball
34. Best pet
OBJECTIVE:
Some cards are strong in Standard, others shine in Draft, but which card looks the tastiest? Take turns being the Judge and decide which Magic card is the best of the best in each wacky category.
GET READY:
Randomly determine who will be the first Judge. Each player then opens a pack, removes any cards without Magic backs, and looks at their cards.
LET’S PLAY:
The Judge chooses a category from the list on the back of this card (either their favorite or at random). The other players each secretly submit a card from their pack that they think fits the category.
When the Judge has collected all the cards, they reveal each card, read it aloud, then choose the winner.
The Judge role then passes to the next player, and they select a different category.
TO WIN:
The first player to win three categories is the winner!
CATEGORIES:
1. Best vacation spot
2. First pick in Draft
3. Grossest
4. Cutest
5. Shiniest
6. Best rock band name
7. Most likely to eat a hedron
8. Best party leader
9. Most inept
10. Coolest treasure
11. Most heroic
12. Most likely to split the party
13. Loudest
14. The next Planeswalker
15. The next fad diet
16. Best mystery novel title
17. Best birthday gift
18. Best win condition
19. Worst weather
20. Worst way to die
21. Best flavor text
22. Best dinner date
23. Most likely to steal your date
24. Best dressed
25. Tastiest
26. Hottest
27. Biggest
28. Smallest
29. Most dangerous job
30. Dream job
31. Most colorful
32. Colossal Dreadmaw’s dinner
33. Last picked in dodgeball
34. Best pet
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 1747 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great watch!!!!
Color: Grey
Excellent quality, one of the best, elegant.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Excellent value for an automatic watch, keeps VERY good time.
Color: Grey, Color: Grey
I've only had the watch for a day but wanted to leave a quick review on it to share a couple of notes.
So far it keeps VERY good time, better than any of the automatics I own (including a Rolex Submariner, Tag Heuer Aquaracer, Tag Heuer Formula One, and several other sub $1k watches). I set it to an atomic time app on my phone yesterday and 24 hours later it's still SPOT on - hasn't gained/lost even a 1/10 of a second. I was shocked to see it's kept PERFECT time for the last day, I'm really blown away so far. I've worn it the entire time, we'll see how well it keeps time while being stored in a winder.
This picture shown is the watch with a 22mm leather band on it, fit's without any issues (just need to squeeze in the leather a tad). I doubt it would work with a 22mm metal bracelet, but leather works great. Just FYI since the 21mm lug width is kind of odd.
The face isn't quite a lustrious as the images make it look, but it's still a great-looking watch. For a sub $1000 automatic you can't go wrong, this is a fantastic watch at a great price. It'll be my daily driver for some time I'm sure. If I have any issues in the future I'll update the review.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 22, 2021
★★★★★ 5
It looks really cool and striking.
Color: Grey, Color: Grey
Really cool and beautiful watch. Although my specific unit runs 5 seconds fast every day—at first it’s annoying, but eventually you stop caring. 🤣
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2026
★★★★★ 5
A Beautiful Timepiece at an Awesome Price!!
Color: Grey, Color: Grey
I have lusted after this watch for four months. I first tried on a similar model (stainless steel band with a green face) in a local jewelry shop (Spitz Jewlers, Walnut Creek, CA, USA). It was "love at first sight," even if I didn't love the white lines on the face from 12-6 and 3-9. At the time, the MSRP was $775.
The MSRP has since increased to $795. But I bought this beauty on Amazon.com for only $524.99; after applying the cash-back from my Prime credit card, this watch costs only $498.75. This was "the offer that I could not refuse," to quote from "The Godfather."
Accuracy could be better: after only a few days, it is now 7 seconds behind my phone (to which I set my new watch). But I don't really care about that all that much. This is why I rated "accuracy" at 4 stars, but my overall review is 5 stars.
My video shows the date changing suddenly at 11:59:59pm, just how I want it; in another photo, you can see that my Seiko changes the date more slowly, which I do not like.
This watch is absolutely phenomenally beautiful. If you're on the fence over whether to make this purchase, then I would say "go for it!" You will not find a prettier, more accurate watch at a lower price in ANY store in the entire USA.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2023
★★★★★ 4
Classy and sporty. Great value!
Color: Grey, Color: Grey
Excellent watch for the price. Looks sporty and dressy. More towards dress watch. Blue is dynamic. Strongly recommend blue for sporty feel. I was thinking of aqua terra. This come close to it with a price less than what i would have paid my state tax for omega aqua terra. My only concern is bracelet which i feel kind of OK. Better bracelet design would have made this watch much superior. 21 lug width is awful. Other than that, nothing to complain.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 13, 2020