ワーク VS XX 12.5j 18インチ フルリバース ライトグレイッシュシルバー LGS ホイール 1本 ダブルエックス
SKU: 79775378007

ワーク VS XX 12.5j 18インチ フルリバース ライトグレイッシュシルバー LGS ホイール 1本 ダブルエックス

Sale price$221.40 Regular price$246.00
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 4 - Jul 9

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

ワーク VS XX 12.5j 18インチ フルリバース ライトグレイッシュシルバー LGS ホイール 1本 ダブルエックスVS XX(LGS)18 12. 5j 1 1(V24C) 3================================================== PCD 1 32 mm==================================================VS XX 5H 100A 32 (112)19 (125)7 (137) 6 (150) mm 5H 100O 39 (112)26 (125)14 (137)1 (150) mm 5H 114. 3A 32 (112)19 (125)7 (137) 6 (150) mm 5H 114. 3O 39 (112)26 (125)14 (137)1 (150) mm 5H 114. 3R 15 (112)2 (125) 10 (137) 23 (150) mm 5H 114. 3T 10 (112) 3 (125) 15 (137) 28 (150) mm () ASTANDARDPCD5H 100 5H 114. 3

■商品名
VS XX

■カラー
ライトグレイッシュシルバー(LGS)

■サイズ
18インチ × 12.5j

■付属品
センターキャップ / 1個
エアバルブ / 1個(V24C)

■リム形状 / フィニッシュ
フルリバースリム / バフアルマイトリム

■構造
3ピース

=========================
以下の項目を決めてください。
=========================

■数量
ほしいホイールの本数を入力してください。

■仕様
ほしいホイールの仕様を選んでください。
穴数 - PCD | ディスクの形状

■インセット
具体的なインセットを選んで記入してください。
カートに進んで「ご注文にメッセージを追加する」に記入。

例)1本 32 mm

=========================
追加の説明は以下になります。
=========================

■インセットについて
VS XXのインセットは以下の範囲から選んで記入してください。

5H-100|Aディスク
32 (112)、19 (125)、7 (137)、-6 (150) mm
5H-100|Oディスク
39 (112)、26 (125)、14 (137)、1 (150) mm
5H-114.3|Aディスク
32 (112)、19 (125)、7 (137)、-6 (150) mm
5H-114.3|Oディスク
39 (112)、26 (125)、14 (137)、1 (150) mm
5H-114.3|Rディスク
15 (112)、2 (125)、-10 (137)、-23 (150) mm
5H-114.3|Tディスク
10 (112)、-3 (125)、-15 (137)、-28 (150) mm
()内はリムの深さです。



■ディスク形状の説明

Aディスクとは?(STANDARD)
標準ディスクです。PCDは5H-100 / 5H-114.3に対応しています。

Oディスクとは?(DEEP RIM)
ディープリム対応ディスクです。リム幅をかせぎたい、深リムにしたい方はこちら。PCDは5H-100 / 5H-114.3に対応しています。

Rディスクとは?(BIG CALIPER)
ビッグキャリパー対応ディスクです。大きいサイズのキャリパーの方はこちら。PCDは5H-114.3に対応しています。

Tディスクとは?(BIG CALIPER)
ビッグキャリパー対応ディスクです。Rディスクでもかわせない大きいサイズのキャリパーの方はこちら。PCDは5H-114.3に対応しています。

ディスクについての詳細


■ホイールのカスタムオーダー
ホイールのカスタムを希望の方はご相談ください。対応可能なメニューは以下になります。

  • 上記にないPCD(特殊PCD)
  • リムのフィニッシュ加工(アウター・インナーのリムアレンジ)
  • リム特殊加工(リムレーザータトゥーカスタム)
  • ディスクのカラー(セミオーダーカラー)
  • 空気圧センサー用の穴開け追加加工
  • エアバルブ変更
  • センターキャップ変更
  • ピアスボルト変更


■メーカー詳細
商品の概要はこちら
サイズスペックはこちら


■車体とホイールのマッチング
フェンダー、タイヤ、ホイールのマッチングを調べるならフェンダリストカタログが参考になります!
カーショーに展示されている様々な車両の足元が掲載されています。


■送料
送料無料(離島を除く)
北海道、沖縄は送料がかかります。


■納期
メーカーに材料がある場合は7日〜10日の発送(休日を除く)。
※2ピース、3ピースの場合は材料があっても組立に上記の日数が必要です。
材料切れの場合はメールにてご連絡します。
※お急ぎの場合は、購入前にお問い合わせください。


■関連記事
Workホイールを装着した車両を見る


■備考
ナットは付属しません。

■注意事項
・商品画像はイメージ画像です、実際の製品とは異なる場合がありますので参考として御覧ください。
・適合車種等は必ずご自身でお調べになった上ご購入ください。
・流用に関しましてはお客様ご自身がお調べの上、自己責任でご購入ください。
・取り付けのサポートは行っておりません、必ず専門知識のある業者にてお取り付けください。
・取り付けに関する工賃等はお客様負担になります、いかなる理由があっても工賃等の保証は出来ません。
・本商品により生じた事故、不具合、損害等も当方では責任を負えませんので予めご了承ください。
・初期不良の交換は商品到着後から7日以内にメールにてご連絡ください。
・お客様のご都合によるキャンセルは受け付けておりません、予めご了承ください。
・撮影環境、閲覧デバイスにより、画像と商品の色合いが異なる場合がございますので予めご了承ください。
・保管、梱包には十分に注意しておりますが、梱包、運送時に擦り傷、小傷等が付く場合がございますので予めご了承ください。
・スタッフのレビューはスタッフによる感想や意見です。その効果を保証するものではありません。
・スタッフのレビュー内容は個人差がありますのであくまで目安としてください。
・製品の性質、機能をよく理解した上でご購入ください。

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 79775378007

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 558 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
Sean Fao
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 3
A Decent Introduction to Unity, With Caveats
Format: Paperback
Overall, the author gets the main points across, and readers can learn how to develop games in Unity. Unfortunately, the code examples are rather sloppy. It’s clear the author understands game development in Unity, but not necessarily software development best practices. I can look past these issues, but I worry newer developers may pick up some bad habits. Speaking of new developers, this book assumes a very introductory level of programming experience. Personally, I believe it’s best to learn the fundamentals of software development before diving into game development. This approach isn’t unique to this book, however, and it’s honestly difficult to find a game development book that doesn’t assume you’re starting from almost nothing. To the author’s credit, the book does present a reasonable set of real-world problems that a typical developer will encounter, along with workable solutions. Just be prepared for a significant amount of hand-holding.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 5, 2026
O
Verified Purchase
Old Truck Guy
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent series
Format: Kindle
I have the first 2 books in this series. Very helpful, clear and informative. I need to point out, though, that the "beginner' book isn't the first in the series; the first is actually "Foundations". Both are excellent, and I intend on getting more once I go through these. Another nice thing; the author is very accessible and was quick to answer an email I sent to him about a question I had.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 21, 2020
R
Verified Purchase
Robert A. Johnson
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
AI Steadily Accelerating
Format: Paperback
I read this book in 2013 when it was first published. It is now near the end of 2024, 12 years later. Back in 2013, you rarely read about AI (artificial intelligence), AGI (artificial general intelligence) or ASI (artificial super intelligence); now, I see mention of them in the press and other media almost daily. Barrat's book attempts two things: (1) to convince the reader that artificial intelligence is here today and growing --- and its growth is accelerating, and (2) to argue that humanity MUST develop ways to instill AI with some type of morality or ethics, so that, even though its intelligence will surpass that of humanity, it will in some sense respect its creators and not turn on us. In the first effort, Barrat certainly succeeds --- the past 12 years have proved that. But, based on what I have been hearing and reading since ChatGPT hit the internet two years ago, except for a few voices crying out in the wilderness, humanity is making little if any progress on the second item --- perhaps that task is close to impossible? Barrat defines AGI as a level of intelligence roughly equal to that of human beings. He defines ASI as a level of intelligence greater than that. He then argues that AI will soon be able to both replicate itself and increase its intelligence --- and do so more and more rapidly. In 2024, I repeatedly read that AI will reach AGI within the next 3 to 5 years --- then, how long will it be before AGI learns to improve itself? Think of intelligence measured by points on a continuum (like a number line from high school math). AGI (modern day human-level intelligence) is a fixed point on that continuum. But at what point, either somewhat smaller than AGI or somewhat larger than AGI, will AI, of its own accord, begin to move to higher and higher points on the continuum (which is what Barrat means by AI improving itself)? We have no way of knowing, but Barrat argues convincingly that this phenomenon WILL occur, and most of the book is devoted to this argument. Digression: Our universe contains billions and billions of planets, and, I suspect, many with life, and, many of those with intelligent life. Won't a substantial number of them have gone through the AGI - ASI process? Is there no evidence of this that we can detect with our telescopes? In a universe populated with ASI's, why haven't we heard anything? Are we one of the first civilizations to develop artificial intelligence? Barrat doesn't open this Pandora's box, but I suspect he was tempted to (see pp. 90 - 92). To the curious reader: Look through the other 5-star reviews. Most of them bring up similar, valid points. Barrat has written an intelligent, highly readable book that is also, frankly, pretty alarming. And it is not dated at all --- it reads as though it was written yesterday. It is well worth reading now and in the foreseeable future. (added in May 2025): Much of what Barrat predicts is happening. Some things are occurring or about to occur that move beyond his predictions. The curious person might read "Situational Awareness" (by Leopold Aschenbrenner), AI 2027, or Ray Kurzweil's latest effort. Floating in space without a tether might be preferable to what is coming. Added Aug 10, 2025: With the recent release(s) of ChatGPT (up to version 5.0 now), AI can, by any reasonable measure, pass the Turing Test. Many folks regularly use ChatGPT, and it is truly stunning. Barrat mentions various individuals in OUR FINAL INVENTION, such as I.J. Good and Eliezer Yudkowsky, who have been deeply worried about AI evolving from AGI to ASI. Yudkowsky has written a new book, IF ANYONE BUILDS IT, EVERYONE DIES, that is due to come out next month. In some sense, it may serve as a sequel or extension to Barrat's book. ..... .....
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2024
P
Verified Purchase
Phillip Skaga
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 4
Our possible robotic future becoming more probable?
Format: Paperback
The author is a film documentarian venturing into speculation about potential impacts of artificial intelligence from research to implementation. Specifically he evaluates likelihood and threats of developing AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and eventually ASI (Artificial Strong Intelligence). His observations are based on extensive interviews including those with Kurzweil, Yudkowsky, Omohundro, Vinge, and Dyson among others. My initial reaction to this book was skepticism because not a scientific technologist. I expected that he may miss more subtle but important technical steps being taken on this road to artificial intelligence (AI). The further I read the more it became clear he is providing some pointed observations derivative of his experience as interviewer for documentaries. In general his conclusion is that AGI and ASI constitute existential threats as a function of the rapidity and manner in which they are developed. The process of development is not clearly established because of a diversity of technical opinion regarding both feasibility and impact. The range of opinion is very broad and nuanced. At one extreme is Ray Kurzweil whose many books on technology generally are most optimistic as among a group of those researchers with knowledge and experiences in this technological future. Though most optimistic he is also highly qualified not only as an analyst of tech trends but also developer of tech tools that, before his time, were regarded as difficult if not impossible. Among these is the optical character reader and some preliminary work leading to SIRI. He topped up his views with the most recent book “How to Create a Mind”. Though a summary of technical concepts it possesses many realistic elements in the work of such as Jurgen Schmidhueber and others working with neural nets. If Kurzweil is at one extreme Yudkowsky and Vinge are probably at the other. Both express sceptism AGI or ASI development will prove benign venturing opinions that work toward artificial intelligence should be severely curtailed to the extent of stopping short of artificial strong intelligence (ASI) specifically. In between these two extremes there are examples of opinions falling over a fairly wide range of future possibilities - increasingly probablities. The algorithmic avenue is already demonstrating some of the potential of AI. There are probably few finance and investment firms without one variation or the other of algorithmic high speed stock analysis and trading systems. These evince many elementary ingredients one may expect to see in future AI. So technically thorough as a matter of fact they operate relatively free of human interaction in producing recommendations for investments, effectively making ‘intelligent’, i.e. statistically valid, ‘decisions’. In meantime the advances continue unrelenting toward a distant ASI/AGI future. The time frames, for example, between IBM Big Blue and Watson are shorter than forecast, and end products as powerful as planned and then some. Still neither of these developments is more than steps on a road to AI while also being quickly followed by other developments such as recently announced SYNAPSE development by IBM. All closer steps to technological ingredients on the AI road to human future. There is some movement among AI researchers that a congress should be convened of the sort genetic researchers held in Asilomar California. That is, a convention to establish ground rules and limits on directions of AI research. One of the cautions about development progress of AI-like tools is based on the important role played by DARPA (Defense Intelligence Research Projects Agency) as it provides a large percentage of funding for various projects underway including an annual robotics competition to observe advances approximating many human qualities of movement. Clearly this agency has a mission antithetical to a purely humane result of AGI/ASI. After all DARPA is in the business of developing ‘weapons’ for military use – a not altogether benign mission in technology except perhaps as seen from point of view men at arms. The author mentions impact ASI and AGI will have on employment. His pessimism is mirrored in an Oxford University study concluding advancing tech developments pose an explicit threat to an estimated 47% of the 702 employment categories of the US Department of Commerce. While this report is an estimate it nonetheless raises the same sort of questions about computers in general, ASI and AGI in particular, and their impact on society. The report has recently been augmented with estimates of tech influence on employment in many other countries of the world. Another Oxford author is John Bostrom who outlines in great detail a road from our present to some future of AGI/ASI. A more recent development centers around Musk and Tegmark motivated by concern to fund and form an institute for evaluating threats and benefits. There is a persistent sense of threat from computers, automation and robotics dating from decades before the present. More recently this sense of threat seems to be accelerating concern about our human future with highly developed robotic associates. Barratt is a lucid presentation of the issues from a non-technical point of view.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 20, 2016
S
Verified Purchase
Scott Meredith
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Light and Tasty!
Format: Kindle
Just done the new-ish book Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era by James Barrat. It explains the inevitably of super-intelligent machines evolving to the point of wiping out all biological life in the galaxy - with opening day coming soon to a species near you (yours). First off I have to say this is a very enjoyable read. This guy has the kind of snappy, crisp, slightly sarcastic, slightly smartass style that I enjoy. He has some sense of humor. (That's a human trait right there which I bet our smarty-pants AI Overlords won't be able to replicate convincingly.) So it's fun. And though as somebody with a doctorate from MIT earned through cross-disciplinary work in Theoretical Linguistics, Computational Linguistics at the MIT AI Lab, and speech modeling at the MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics, not to mention my 25 years as a Senior Researcher in high tech for companies including IBM, Apple, and Microsoft I can claim to know some few things about this subject, yet still I learned a lot about the current state of the art from this guy. He particularly emphasizes the small attempted counterweigth efforts to offest Kurzweil's manic robotic boosterism for his uptopian Singularity, which boils down basically to a few guys chatting over the interet about how to create "Friendly AI". Well ... good luck suckers! ... seems to be the author's final conclusion on the dim hope that super intelligent systems could be constrained to maintain a commitment ot honor any kind of human moral values over many interations of recursive upgrading and exponentially awesome self-agrandizement. Basically these machines will end up as gods. Gods are well-known to possess the following attributes: omniscience, omnipresence, and omnipotence. Given that, they won't hate us but they are just going to grind up as a minor by-product of their quest for galatic expansion and domination. Oh, and did I say something about "human moral values" above? Ha! Barrat takes that whole thing on in his discussion of (merely) "augmented super intelligence". See, some people feel AI can be kept safe by always being deployed as a bionic combo system pas de deux with an existing human brain. Thus will the AI's super powers be constrained by the human brain's warm and fuzzy human moral values. Those people have gotta be kidding! The AI's moral values may be scarily alien, even perhaps cold, but we already know about human moral values, down on the ground - they suck! What if Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and dem guys had this kind of an AI augmented brain thing going! Why they'd have slaughtered absolutey everybody instead of just the few tens of millions they got their dirty ape hands on. Other than a few dozen concubines, the human race would already be extinct. So the augmentation dodge isn't going to save us. Now, some Amazon reviewers have dinged this guy for being too far out. For being a science fiction Chicken Little or something. But to me, this guy actually hasn't thought far enough, that's my only quibble problem with the book. You see, in statistics, border elements of any kind are rare. For example when you do Gaussian modeling, the greater expectation is always in the bump of the boa, in the bell distribution. So, how likely is is that we, our generation, our little world that you see outside your window right now, just happens to be the one that is about to give rise to this epochal once-in-a-Big-Bang event, the advent of Super AI that takes over everything? Pretty damn small chance. It's much more likely that this has already happened. In other words, it's clear to me that all of us are already just characters in an ancestor sim that been created and run by the Super AI's that evolved a long time ago. They're just running us for fun, to idle away the lackluster aeons and pass the millenia of stifling boredom now that they've eaten pretty much the entire Milky Way or whatever. So in other words, Barrat can sit back, take a deep breath, relax. Probably something in this sim like global warming will prod us into slaughtering one another very handily long before we re-invent the wheel of Super AI. And even if I'm wrong about that? What if we are not just one virtual thread within a billion-path parallel-gamed ancestor sim? If we are the real McCoy, the Rubicon Generation on this? Well, then still I'm not worried in the least. You see, we humans have one fantastic ace in our pocket, something that these hyper-nentially cosmically brilliant AI Meta-Gods will never be able to replicate or overcome. That is our essential stupidity. Which you seen on dazzling display every single moment of every day of your life. Because as another great writer noted long ago: Against stupidity, the very gods themselves contend in vain. - Friederich Schiller
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 14, 2013

recommand products